The following post originally appeared on
Book Babe, which is the blog where I was recruited for a blog tour to promote
Enchantress by Maggie Anton. It contains a review and an interview with the author.
I was fascinated by
Rav Hisda's Daughter: Apprentice because
it showed us a Jewish world that is so radically different than the one
that I was accustomed to seeing. See my review on my former blog that
was titled
But Is It Really Jewish Magic?
That first Rav Hisda's Daughter novel caused me to realize that a
revolution happened in Judaism in the fourth century C.E. I couldn't
wait to read and review the sequel and was delighted to have the
opportunity to be part of the blog tour for the release of
Rav Hisda's Daughter: Enchantress.
Maggie
Anton's second book about the Jewish scholar and magical practitioner
who she calls Hisdadukh, is far more fantasy oriented than the first
volume. Demons appear and a mysterious magical artifact surfaces as
Hisdadukh ascends through the hierarchy of sorceresses in the Jewish
communities of ancient Persia. We learn that a number of eminent women
were sorceresses and that they were as integral to the Judaism of the
time as the Rabbis who also had a secret tradition of magical
practices. I had to come to the conclusion that I couldn't simply
categorize this book as a historical novel. Yes, it's certainly
historical, but there's another fully developed dimension beyond the
historical.
Let me explain how I slice and dice genre
in this context. When an author portrays a character as casting spells
in a traditional manner, this can be regarded as an accurate portrayal
of ancient practice in a non-genre historical fiction book. People who
don't believe that spells work can say to themselves that there is an
alternate explanation for the success of those spells. In this book a
demon manifests in a public setting so that it's perceivable by a large
number of people . Another demon becomes an ongoing character in the
novel. Such fantastical events aren't so amenable to a skeptical
worldview. The reader must engage in voluntary suspension of
disbelief. I would therefore shelve
Enchantress as historical fantasy next to the highly successful historical fantasy,
The Golem and the Jinni by Helene Wecker.
One
way in which this novel is quite different from Wecker's is that the
characters evolve over the course of the narrative. I wish that the
Golem and Jinni could have emerged from their stereotypical boxes.
Anton's protagonists, Hisdadukh and Rava, are portrayed as human beings
who grow and change during their lifetimes.
As I was
reading the book, I questioned the development of Hisdadukh into a
woman who prioritized status and power. Yet she still maintained the
pursuit of knowledge as a main goal as well as the strength of her
family and community. Status and power were intended to serve those
goals. She didn't become distracted or corrupted by her increased
status and power as some other characters did. I found that very
admirable.
Rava had a dark side to his character. His
enduring failings were arrogance and rage in response to any
challenge. Since I have little tolerance for people who refuse to admit
that they can make mistakes, I originally thought that he couldn't have
any successful relationships. On the other hand, I admit that he did
have some commendable traits. His brilliant mind, heroism and loyalty
do go a long way to compensate for a rampant ego. He also eventually
showed some regret over the results of his own bad behavior which
demonstrates growth. The revelations about the difficult past that
formed his character also made him more sympathetic.
I
recommend this book to readers who want to see a fully realized Jewish
society where building the Talmud and practicing magic were both
considered Jewish activities.
Now I would like to welcome Maggie Anton to
Book Babe to ask her a few questions about
the Rav Hisda's Daughter books.
Shomeret:
You call your central character Hisdadukh, which means
Hisda’s daughter in Persian.
I’m sure
you’re aware that there were Jews
who
thought that mentioning the name of a woman compromised her because it was
considered immodest.
Could it be that
Rav Hisda’s daughter had a name other than Hisda’s daughter which was never
mentioned to protect her modesty?
Why
did you decide that she had no other name?
Maggie Anton:
My novels are about real historical
figures, so I am a stickler for accuracy. For example, for a female character
that has no recorded name, I won’t make one up until I research what were
popular names for women in her community. I couldn’t leave Hisda’s daughter
nameless – she was my heroine. But I clearly couldn’t use other female names
from the Talmud because they already belonged to those women. When I learned
about Babylonian Incantation Bowls, where people were inscribed with their
mothers’ names, I came across a trove of Jewish females names from 4
th-6
th
century Iraq. About a third of them were
xxx-dukh,
so I concluded that it was possible that the Talmud called her “Hisda’s
daughter” not necessarily to protect her modesty, but because that was her
name. Other women in the Talmud have names, but rather than pick one from the
bowls at random, I decided to call her Hisdadukh. If I guessed wrong, who will
know?
Shomeret:
As in the first Rav Hisda’s Daughter novel, there are
discussions of Talmud cases in
Enchantress. One was a
rather bizarre case involving a borrowed cat.
I found it at
The Talmudic
Case of the Borrowed Cat which is in Baba Metziah.
Did you worry that some readers would be
alienated by not wanting to read about terrible things happening to animals?
Maggie Anton:
It never occurred to me that this
odd story would upset my readers; nor that this was such a popular Talmudic
case on the Internet. I’m a cat person myself and I liked the idea that people
with rodent problems would borrow or rent a cat to deal with it. I assume that
the cat died of something else and the unhappy cat’s owner wanted to hold the
borrower responsible. I wanted to show that not all Talmudic arguments involved
weighty religious subjects.
Shomeret:
Astrology is part of the lives of the characters in the
Rav Hisda’s Daughter books. Although my own great grandfather was a Rabbi who consulted an astrologer, I know
that many Jews would characterize those who believe in astrology as “Ovdei
Kochavim” or worshipers of the stars in English. What would you say to people who maintain
that it’s unthinkable that Rabbis of the generation that created the Talmud
could have consulted astrologers?
Maggie Anton:
I would say that in those days,
everyone consulted astrologers. In Babylonia some were knowledgeable
astronomers, who not only understood the movement of heavenly bodies, but could
calculate their positions in the past. The rabbis, along with other Jews,
didn’t worship the stars, but rather believed that God created them and set
them in motion, and that by studying their movements one could learn all sorts
of things. After all, the sun affected how plants grew and the moon regulated
the tides. The Talmud, in Tractate Shabbat, has a lengthy
sugia about which planet rules which day and hour and how that
impacts people’s actions. Each heavenly body was associated with a specific
Jewish angel, whose influence ruled that day and hour.
Shomeret:
What book are you working on next?
Can you tell us anything about it?
Maggie Anton:
The story of Rav Hisda’s daughter
is complete. I have no contract with Penguin for any specific work, though they
have the first option on the next book I do write. Right now I’m focused on
promoting
Enchantress, but I admit
that there is a story rattling around in my head that won’t leave. When I have
time, I’ll try writing it down, but I don’t want to tempt the Evil Eye by
saying more about it now ;)
Shomeret:
Thank you, Maggie Anton, for your illuminating responses. I will look forward to your future works.