I received a review copy of Inferior: How Science Got Women Wrong from Edelweiss last year. I admit that I should have gotten to it sooner. I finally read it because it was the Book of the Month on a Goodreads group. I've posted some comments to the group's discussion thread, but I know that isn't sufficient. When I request books from Edelweiss, I commit to reviewing them on my blog. My review is rather late, but I still feel that I owe the publisher and Edelweiss a blog review. So let's see if I can generate one.
I consider Inferior a survey on the subject of science written about women which has actually been dealt with in more depth in narrower books dealing with women in particular fields of science.
Nevertheless, Saini points things out that I hadn't realized before. For example, I hadn't known that androgen increases risk-taking behavior, not aggression. It occurred to me that there are both pros and cons to being risk-takers. Saini doesn't really discuss the implications of androgen and risk-taking very much. Since women's hormone balance changes as we become older, does science show that post-menopausal women do in general take more risks than younger women? I am skeptical about this possibility.
I also hadn't known that in addition to human women only female killer whales survive past menopause. This is interesting, but then the book lets me down with obvious ideas about elders having something to contribute which is very inter-cultural.
So while I do agree that we need better science about women, I didn't find that Saini provided much in the way of fresh insight on the subject.