I do occasionally read Christian theology, particularly if a woman wrote it. I don't recall when I read author Elaine Pagels previously because it was a pre-computer read. I'm pretty sure that it was The Gnostic Gospels, and that I was impressed with it. Since I have no record of reading it, I don't have any further remarks.
I recently finished reading Pagels' book Miracles and Wonder. I received a copy from Net Galley for review. So I'm reviewing it here and will post an excerpted version of the review on Goodreads as I am in the habit of doing.
Each chapter addresses a theological question based on the gospels. Pagels thinks that Jesus' followers were "papering over inconvenient facts". One problem was Jesus being regarded as "illegitimate". So the early Christians decided that his mother was made pregnant by God. Other problems were Jesus being tossed into a common grave and his rising from the dead. He also shouldn't be seen as a failed Jewish messiah who never established a kingdom in Israel, as the Jewish messiah is expected to do. Yet Pagels' Jesus really needs no actual kingdom because he lives within us.
She tells us that when she quotes Greek translations of the Christian Gospels, they are her own translations. They literally are Greek to me. I know no Greek, and would therefore have no way of checking or confirming Pagels' translations.
This author believes that people are continually being attracted to Jesus because his stories are revised to respond to whatever the current issues are in each era.
One of my issues is egalitarianism. In this book, there are numerous quotes from Psalms that focus on egalitarianism and justice. Though I do have to say that Psalms is attributed to a King. Monarchy is not an egalitarian institution, nor a particularly just one.
Pagels points out that if Jesus was the son of Mary and Joseph, he can't be the son of God. I actually don't care about Jesus' parentage myself.
Pagels thinks that Jesus called himself "the Son of Man" in order to avoid calling himself either the son of God or a messiah. Pagels says that "Son of Man" is a cover for his true identity, like Clark Kent was for Superman.
It piqued my interest when Pagels said that the Kingdom of God might be "an earthly kingdom with divine values". To me, this description points right at Tibet. I'm a fan of novels that take place in Tibet--most notably by Eliot Pattison. I'd like to call my readers' attention to a review of Pattison's Bones of the Earth that I posted to this blog here.
But let's get back to Jesus. Some of Jesus' miracles can be explained. Pagels tells us about an instance from the Gospel of Mark in which Jesus brought back a girl from the dead. Yet she may have been in a coma. Coma comes from the Greek word meaning "to sleep". Jesus tells her in Aramaic "Little girl, get up." She rises immediately and begins to walk.
Jesus would often tell people, "Your faith has healed you." Pagels wonders if these healings happened as a result of the placebo effect. That seems likely to me.
Sometimes Pagels makes statements that I know to be inaccurate or confused. For example, she says that the Romans re-named Israel as Judea.
After the reign of King Solomon, the Jews had two kingdoms. They were the Kingdom of Judea and the Kingdom of Israel. They were two different territories geographically. The Kingdom of Judea's capital was Jerusalem, and the Kingdom of Israel's capital was Samaria. This comes from the biblical Books of Prophets.
Later, when the people of the Kingdom of Judea went into exile in Babylon, the people of the Kingdom of Israel stayed in Palestine. The practices of the Judeans evolved in Babylon by becoming much more codified. The practices of the Kingdom of Israel became more polytheistic, and therefore no longer recognizable as Jewish. The Kingdom of Israel was eventually conquered by the Assyrians. Its people became thoroughly assimilated by their conquerors.
When the Persians conquered Babylon, the Jews living in Babylon were encouraged to return to where they had lived in Judea. Many of them did so, though a great many remained in Babylon.
The four paragraphs above this one are the historical background that Pagels either didn't know or chose not to include.
I am bemused by Pagels' statement that stories of Jesus feeding people "strips the gospel narratives of meaning". Generosity may not be a miracle, but it is significant. Can't Jesus be both a messiah and generous? It doesn't invalidate the claim of being a messiah, and in fact makes him even more worthy of that title.
Pagels wonders what is left of the Jesus story when the legends and myths are stripped away. Well, that's easy. There have been some really great men who have benefited humanity since Jesus. Some of them were certainly inspired by Jesus. The Reverend Martin Luther King comes to mind for both me and Pagels. His stature needs no miracle stories to assure him a place in history. I think the same can be said of Jesus.
I discovered from this book that the artist Marc Chagall painted crucifixions . Previously, I'd only seen Jewish identified Chagall paintings. Pagels specifically mentions The White Crucifixion. The link provided is from marcchagall.net.
I also learned from Pagels that the majority of the Dalits of India are Christians. This isn't surprising since they were vilified as Untouchables in Hinduism for so many centuries.
I found out from this book that there is a South African movie called The Son of Man. It interprets the story of Jesus in terms of the struggle against apartheid. That's a fascinating approach, but Pagels reveals that it depicts Mary Magdalene negatively. She also discusses a British film called Mary Magdalene but comments I saw online dissuaded me from seeing it.
A book on the bibliography called The Cross and the Lynching Tree drew my interest. I intend to read it, but I'm not certain when I can get to it.
I thought that Miracles and Wonder was conceptually interesting, but I was surprised by what Pagels didn't seem to know. So I'm giving it four stars on Goodreads.