This is a post that I copied from Book Babe because I had a few more things to say about the book that I think will interest my readers.
Some would say that we don't need another Arthurian novel. I'm not
one of those people. I believe that the Matter of Britain, which is
what the Arthurian myths are called by those who are centrally concerned
with them, needs to get retold in every generation. I'm also still
holding out for my ideal Arthurian novel. The Mists of Avalon wasn't
it. I was more interested in Marion Zimmer Bradley's portrayal of the
relationship between Arthur and Lancelot than any of the women. More
recently there was Gwenhwyfar by Mercedes Lackey. That version
of Guinevere as a warrior was a good deal closer to my ideal than
anything else I'd seen. She was almost what I was looking for. I
could see why Arthur (who was a warrior king) would feel a common bond
with that Guinevere and would be impressed with her. She was strong
and capable. She also despised court intrigue as much as I do. Yet I
wanted a Guinevere who could be a convincing and authentic priestess as
well as a warrior. I thought that Daughter of Destiny by Nicole Evalina would give me the Guinevere that I was looking for. I received a free copy from the author in return for this honest review.
was delighted that Guinevere was sent to Avalon to be trained as a
priestess in this version. I also really liked Evalina's idea that the priestesses of Avalon refer to the God and the Goddess because Avalon was culturally diverse and they wanted to avoid conflict over whose deities were superior. This means that Avalon was henotheist. Henotheism is the belief that there are many deities, but this particular one is the one I worship. It seems to me that most ancient religions were henotheist. I think the Neo-Pagans who use the God and the Goddess currently really do believe that there is only one of each.
When Guinevere arrived on Avalon at eleven years old, she was clearly too
young to appreciate the lessons she was learning or the importance of
her psychic gift. I can understand that she couldn't be an inspiring
figure at that age, but I didn't expect her to manifest as the most
hideous female adolescent trope in YA fiction. This was a character
limned with acid. She was the Mean Girl incarnate-- obsessed with minor
slights and plots of petty vengeance. Instead of befriending the
other priestesses in training, she was boiling over with envy of any
girl who seemed to be powerful or favored by the senior priestesses.
Ugh! I found her completely despicable. She was the opposite of
sympathetic for me.
Then tragedy struck and Guinevere
seemed to be on the road toward maturation. At a couple of points, I
thought she was in danger of a Mean Girl relapse but that didn't seem to
be happening. It helped that she was faced with an adult version of
the Mean Girl on a daily basis. Guinevere definitely didn't aspire to
be just like her. That's a good thing because the Queen of Britain
should be building alliances rather than making new enemies.
Unfortunately, royal courts tend to be seething cauldrons of rivalries.
Can this Guinevere rise above all the spitefulness when she wears a
crown? I hope she can. But the truth is that I didn't sign on for
this sort of Guinevere. I wanted her to be so much better than MZB's
Guinevere in The Mists of Avalon, and so far I'm not certain she can measure up to my expectations.
have to confess that I'm more interested in the future of Isolde than I
am in Guinevere. She's no saint, but she's adventurous, resourceful
and is generous towards those that she considers friends. I'm wondering
about how someone as resilient and pragmatic as Isolde gets caught up in
such a tragic story as the one she's credited with in Arthurian myth.
Well, since Evalina starts with the premise that Arthurian myth got it
wrong, I'll be rooting for Isolde to overcome future adversity.
There's a method of divination using a game similar to chess in this book. Evalina says that she invented it. Well, I plugged "chess divination" into my search engine and got an interesting surprise. The first result was Thoughts on the Origins of Chess by Joseph Needham , who was a British scholar on ancient China. Needham wrote in this essay that what we know as chess began as a system of divination in China using heavenly bodies such as the sun, moon and planets as pieces, and that it became a battle game when it moved to India. The purpose of the divination was to discover whether the forces of yin and yang were in balance. Those who study Chinese spirituality know that the entire cosmos is inharmonious if yin and yang aren't balanced. I find it absolutely fascinating that chess really was originally used for divination.